The issue of supporting quotas for supporting women in board room positions and academia are highly contested: Is it really fair that women receive extra support through guaranteed quotas during the application process? Does this not bias the employment process, whereas less qualified personnel was employed? In a blog post over at the LSE’s Engenderings, Linnea Sandström has made a case in favour of quotas, and I want to present some research here that suggests that there is already an implicit selection process favouring one sex over the other—only that it works in favour of men, and that this imbalance is not just attributable to life style choices. Rather, there is a bias direct against female applicants, even when the information about the applicant is the same. Therefore, quotas are about balancing an already existing bias, rather than introducing a new one.
On the Politics in Spires blog, Philip Pettit has published an excellent piece on a republican perspective on democracy, freedom and the markets. In his article, there’s one point that’s particularly notable in my opinion: He argues that the markets should not be taken as an independent entity, but are a socio-political construct, determined not only by the actions of individual market participants, but by the social structure.
“[W]e can avoid being seduced into the libertarian view — now, alas, almost an orthodoxy — that the market is a relatively autonomous sphere which depends only contingently on the framework of custom and law, and on the role of the state in supporting that framework. The role of the state in relation to the market — the role of the community, operating through the state — is constitutive and not just regulative, enabling and not just constraining. And it is extensive in even a greater measure than my five sets of rules suggest, since it also includes providing for the infrastructure of education, communication, transport and insurance that any contemporary economy requires.”
I think that this is an essential point to make: Any riches, and any losses in property are the consequence of a particular status quo and the current social order, as determined by the rules and regulations in a society. Let me elaborate:
German weekly Spiegel Online reports on a new initiative by the EU to make more extensive use of the data gathered about airplane passengers to fight crime. The data to be evaluated will include, amongst others, Names, addresses, itineraries, credit cards, telephone numbers, travel agencies, food preferences, seats and change of reservations. This is a significant number of potential variables, and some seem rather arbitrary to me. (Seriously, food preferences?) This legislation is modelled on the US’s similar law, and is meant to be introduced on international flights at first, but there are plans to introduce it in inner-European flights as well.
It’s been an in-joke amongst Popper’s critics like Paul Feyerabend and Imre Lakatos that in the subject index of Popper’s Open Society and it’s Enemies lists Marxism as “—irrefutable” and “—refuted” at the same time (Lakatos & Feyerabend, 2010).
The best way to present and argument isn’t always confrontational. Sometimes (or should I say often) it’s better to ask the right questions, so that they can work it out themselves. “When did you decide to become heterosexual?” is one of them. It’s not offensive, direct—and gets people thinking.
The hacker group Chaos Computer Club (CCC) has reverse-engineered the German state trojan software that is being used to intercept suspects’ online communication. You can read the full summary of their findings on their website. It is not my aim to reiterate the technical details of how the this remote forensic software works, rather I want to discuss some of the implications that arise from the use of evidence gathered through it.
Both, the German daily TAZ and the weekly Der Spiegel report that the Deutsche Bank has financed lectureships and research projects at Berlin universities, and supported the foundation of the Quantitative Products Laboratory, a research institute in applied financial mathematics. This raises questions about the independence of the research carried out at the institute, and the role of external funding in science.
Immer wieder taucht es auf, das Gespenst der Ökodiktatur, die die wehrlosen Bürger unterjocht und zur bewussten Lebensführung zwingt: Bald gibt es keine Wurststulle mehr, das Auto ist in Zukunft elektrisch und statt des Atomkraftwerks im Nachbarkreis steht wird bald ein Windrad im Garten stehen.
A man and his son were away for a trip. They were driving along the highway when they had a terrible accident. The man was killed outright but the son was alive, although badly injured. The son was rushed to the hospital and was to have an emergency operation. On entering the operating theatre, the surgeon looked at the boy, and said, “I can’t do this operation. This boy is my son.” How can this be?
(Source: Sanford, A. J. (1985). Cognition and cognitive psychology. London:Weidenfeld and Nicolson.)
Politics · 10 February 2011 ·
The great danger in any democratic republic is the danger that people think democracy is an automaton—that is to say, an engine that goes of itself without any effort and that like the battery in the advertisement, it just keeps going and going and going. But, in fact, democracy doesn’t keep going and going and going. It requires the fuel of active citizenship. — Benjamin Barber